Thursday, September 22, 2016

2017 Porsche Panamera...Luxury Sedan In The World


SHORTLY BEFORE DRIVING the all new second-generation Porsche Panamera sedan, I spent a little time hammering a 911 Carrera 4S on the serpentine roads outside Munich. The 911 is fantastic, in all the ways you expect a Porsche to be.

Much later that same day, long after I’d transitioned to the Panamera and was similarly tearing up mountain roads near the Austain border, it took another 911 passing me in the opposite direction to remind me that I’d indeed ditched the 911. That’s how good the family hauler is: Despite conditioning my brain to the handling and responsiveness of a razor-sharp sports car, I barely registered the change after climbing into a far larger, heavier car hauling two passengers, luggage, and a mountain of camera gear.

Say what you will about the shape, but the re-engineered, $98,300 2017 Panamera—with its enhanced balance, sportier roofline, and liposuctioned backside—deserves your respect. It is as capable on a track as it is in traffic and as luxurious as a day at the spa. But then, for 100 grand, it ought to be.

The Panamera has always been … divisive. When Porsche debuted it seven years ago, critics body-shamed its bulbous derriere and cynics denounced the very idea of family-friendly four-door car from Stuttgart as unporschemanlike. Some went so far as to accuse Porsche of diluting its brand. The Germans ignored the naysayers, and history has vindicated them. The Panamera, along with the Cayenne and Macan SUVs (don’t even get the purists started on those), made truckloads of money. Porsche has enjoyed record sales in the US for four years straight.

Everything about the 2017 version of the Panamera is better, including the styling. “There are new engines, a new chassis, and new electronics, and everything conspires to make it much sportier, but still very much a luxury sedan,” says Gernot Döllner, Porsche’s head of product design. Yes, you’d expect him to say that. But he’s right.

Let’s start with the styling, because everyone does. It isn’t gorgeous, but it’s no longer ugly. It’s got the same basic long, low outline, but with a significantly less bulbous rear end. It’s borrowed sporty styling cues from Porsche stalwarts like the 991, 718 Boxter, and Cayman. The roofline takes a more direct route to the taillights. It’s all far tidier and more streamlined.

Those taillights, by the way, are all most people will see if you stand on the gas. The base model Panamera 4S has a twin-turbo V6 good for 440 horsepower. Spend another 47 grand for the Panamera Turbo (yes, both have turbos, just go with it) and you get a twin-turbo with 550 horsepower. The extra 110 ponies is the difference between a top speed of 182 or 190 and a zero to 60 sprint of 4.4 seconds or 3.8.

Either way, the Panamera is crazy stupid fast for a car that weighs 4,400 pounds. Both cars use an eight-speed dual-clutch transmission with glass-smooth shifts. The gearbox offers a great blend of performance in the low gears and efficiency in seventh and eighth. If all that speed still isn’t enough, drop another $6,930 for the Sport Chrono package—which includes launch control and a push-to-pass button for a little more oomph—and shave another two-tenths of your zero to 60 time. That puts you in 911 territory, in a car you can take to Costco.

This being a luxury grand-tourer, the Panamera hits all the right comfort and convenience notes. Lots of leather, an audiophile-level stereo system, knobs and switches that feel like they’re milled from ingots. There’s enough headroom for professional basketball players and all their stuff, and four giant screens with touch-sensitive controls. And the car connects to your Apple Watch and doubles as a Wi-Fi hotspot, because it is 2016 and of course it would be for six-figures.

There’s more tech under the metal. A thermal imaging camera spotlights pedestrians and animals. The adaptive cruise control system, InnoDrive, uses navigation data like upcoming curves and inclines to dial in the optimal acceleration, deceleration, and gear selection, for a smoother, more efficient ride. Dual radar sensors and a camera permit lane-centering and automatic distance control, a boon in stop-and-go traffic.

Ride quality is a hallmark of luxury cars, so the Panamera’s three-chamber air suspension generates a suitably sublime, if not whisper-quiet, ride in comfort mode. When you want to channel Romain Dumas, Porsche’s new “4D Chassis Control system” analyzes road conditions and your current driving style to tune the steering, torque vectoring, and suspension accordingly.

How Airlines Earn Billions From Booking Fees And Baggage Charges


Spirit Airlines is more reliant on extra charges than any other carrier, with 43.4 per cent of its total revenue in 2015 coming from “ancillary” sources, such as baggage and booking fees and the sale of in-flight food and drink.

That’s up from 38.7 per cent on the previous year and will come as no surprise to anyone who has flown with it. The Florida-based airline is one of just a handful of carriers to charge for carry-on luggage, with fees rising from $35 (£27) if paid at the time of booking to $100 (£77) if paid at the airport gate, while its checked baggage fees range from $30 (£23) to $50 (£39).

The success of airlines like Spirit and Ryanair is encouraging full service airlines to adopt similar methods too, it says: “Global leviathans like American, Delta and United are becoming unlikely practitioners by offering basic economy fares that mimic the a la carte approach.

According to the annual report by Idea Works, an aviation industry analyst, 18 per cent of Spirit’s total revenue comes from baggage charges, 14 per cent from online and call centre fees, and four per cent from charges for assigned seating. It all amounts to $51.80 (£40) in ancillary revenue per passenger.

Ryanair, despite recent efforts to upgrade its reputation for extra charges, comes fifth on the list, with 24 per cent of its revenue coming from sources excluding the airfare – a slight fall on last year, when it accounted for 24.6 per cent. That means the airline collected just shy of $1.74bn (£1.34bn) from extra charges in 2015.

The top 10 is completed by two more US airlines (Allegiant and Alaska Air), two UK carriers (Jet2.com and Flybe), and one each from Hungary (Wizz Air), Mexico (Volaris), Australia (Jetstar) and Singapore (Tigerair).

According to the report, which featured data from 67 airlines, revenue from extra charges has more than tripled since 2008.

“Back in 2008, the top 10 airlines, as rated by total ancillary revenue, generated $8.4bn,” it states. “Fast forward to the financial results from 2015 and the top 10 tally has leapt to nearly $26bn.”

But it does not criticise the rise of what it calls the “a la carte” business model. “A frugal consumer can fly with Spirit at minimal expense and add optional extras such as checked bags, seat assignments, and on-board treats. Consumers embrace these a la carte methods; what else would explain how Spirit has grown from 5.5 million passengers in 2008 to nearly 18 million in 2015?”

The success of airlines like Spirit and Ryanair is encouraging full service airlines to adopt similar methods too, it says: “Global leviathans like American, Delta and United are becoming unlikely practitioners by offering basic economy fares that mimic the a la carte approach.

LAX Car Service - MGCLS

Wednesday, September 21, 2016

2017 Audi R8 V10 Plus vs. 2016 McLaren 570S: The Battle of Shenandoah






THE MUCH FEARED FOCKE-WULF FW 190 had a takeoff speed of approximately 112 mph, according to Royal Navy captain Eric Brown, who flew a captured example in 1944 and detailed his impressions in his well-regarded postwar book Wings of the Luftwaffe. Compare this with the Audi R8 V10 Plus, which has a slightly higher takeoff of 121 mph. That's what the ultramodern, 12.3-inch "virtual cockpit" instrument cluster was displaying right before I hit the infamous "ski jump" at Summit Point Motorsports Park's Shenandoah circuit.

For most drivers, in most cars, the ski jump is a nonevent. If you're driving a Miata or a Civic, you'll probably hit it at about 85 mph or less. You'll notice a brief sensation of free fall as the suspension unweights. Try the jump with a five-liter Mustang or a C7 Corvette, you'll see perhaps 110 and get the front wheels off the ground for a fraction of a second. The steering will go completely light in your hands. When that happens, take a deep breath and hold the wheel absolutely straight. If you don't, you'll finish your lap in an ambulance.

This Audi, painted Ara Blue and festooned with carbon-fiber trim that adds an air of purpose to the menace of its blunt face, can do better than that. It rockets flat-footed through Turn 11 with the kind of grip that can't be had from common sports cars. Part of that is due to the mid-engine layout, and part of it is due to the optional 305-width Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 tires in back. No Focke-Wulf ever turned with more alacrity or accelerated with more fury.

The R8 is so fast, attempts to put it into perspective with run-of-the-mill track-day cars end up sounding like the worst kind of bench-racer smack talk. Here's an example: Imagine the best Spec Miata ever built, with the best SCCA driver of all time at the wheel. Put it next to the R8 at the start/finish line. (If you're a street-car guy, feel free to replace that Spec Miata with a new Mustang GT; they turn about the same lap time.) Wave the flag and watch them go. After one lap, there will be a thousand-foot gap between them, in the Audi's favor. After five or six laps, the R8 driver would have enough time to stop the car anywhere on the track, get out, check his tire pressures, get back in the car, unpair his iPhone from the Bluetooth-enabled stereo, pair a different iPhone, start it up, and drive away, without losing his lead. This is what it means to be a supercar.

As blisteringly fast as the Audi is, however, it might not be the faster car in this comparison test. We've also brought a McLaren 570S, which is waiting patiently in the paddock for its chance to rip around the track.

McLaren now divides its lineup into three distinct ranges. The Ultimate Series contains the 903-hp P1 hybrid hypercar. The Super Series consists of the 650S and the 675LT. The 650S is a product-improved version of the MP4-12C that launched in 2011; the 675LT is a track-optimized version of the same that adds power, subtracts weight, and optimizes the aerodynamics for grip in high-speed corners. Below the Super Series is the Sports Series, of which the 570S is the first to hit our shores. It's meant to be a more relaxed, more affordable entry to McLaren ownership. As we'll see, both "relaxed" and "affordable" are relive terms. For now, however, let's return to our blue Audi R8, which is preparing to thunder up the straight at Shenandoah. The instant you get the steering properly unwound at corner exit, it's time for the 5.2-liter V-10 to put its 610 hp to work. It is naturallyólet's say defiantlyóaspirated in this me-too-turbo era. You'll reach the 8700-rpm redline three times on your way up the hill, unleashing a guttural wail that rattles the track's bridge as you blast underneath it.

Ah, here we are, all systems go, lined up on the track's left edge. Ready to fling over the crest and down to the long braking zone before Shenandoah's other notorious feature: a replica of the N¸rburgring's concrete-banked Karussell turn. The car's virtual cockpit, which can display the Google Earth view of a racetrack while you're on it, also offers a tiny speedometer. It's swinging past 120, almost all the way to 125 mph. This would be a good time to make sure your hands are at 9 and 3 on the wheel and to ensure that your seatback is all the way up. Actually, you don't have a choice about that; the V10 Plus has fixed-back racing buckets. Hope you like the seating angle. And that's where I was, in the moment that it all went very wrong. It was my fourth lap in the Audi. I'd figured I'd need between six and 10 laps to extract my best time from the R8, but it was so damn easy to drive quickly that my third lap was already good enough to print in the magazine. The only place I saw possible improvement was over the ski jump; I lifted just a hair near the top to hit it at 117 mph, which sent the R8 four-wheels-up for about 60 feet. This time I was determined to take it flat.

When I did, the R8 leaped from the ground. And it yawed in midair. Nothing to do for the moment but let my hands and arms relax in anticipation of the landing, which was going to be somewhere between hairy and unrecoverable. Photographer Andrew Trahan was stationed on the far side of the hill. He saw the Audi tilt and dip in flight before the left front wheel touched down, maybe 85 feet after takeoff.

What happened next is a blur in my memory. I was threshold braking and furiously hucking the steering wheel back and forth, trying to fix an oscillation that at one point had me looking at Shenandoah's Karussel through the driver's-side window. When the speed was down to about 65 mph, I gave up, took my foot off the brake, and landed in the concrete banking hard enough to bottom the suspension on all four corners and ring the Audi's unibody like a cathedral bell. Then I was back on the throttle and hustling uphill toward Big Bend and the start/finish line.

The time: 1:37.239. Good enough for me. I was in no mood to try it again.

THUS WE MEET THE NEW R8 IN THE AIR, but Audi, like McLaren with the 570S, would rather you meet it in the middle. The market for six-figure sporting cars has a wide spectrum of intensity. On the relaxed, long-wavelength side, we have front-engine contenders from Aston Martin and Maserati. Bentley, with its Continental GT, and Porsche's 911 Turbo. These are the cars you see heading into Manhattan on Monday mornings. They are compatible with parking garages, full-size duffel bags, and the lifestyle of a hedge-fund manager.

Over on the ultraviolent, excuse me, ultraviolet end of the spectrum, you'll find the track-day specials, the N¸rburgring record holders, and the utterly uncompromising. The Ferrari 458 Speciale was a perfect example of the genre, but the McLaren 675LT also belongs there, as does the Viper ACR. Not all of these cars have radios or air-conditioning. Pampered bankers need not apply.

The original Audi R8, with its 4.2-liter V-8 and spacious and impeccably detailed cockpit, was definitely an infrared kind of supercar. Fast, but not too fast. Dramatically proportioned, but easy to get into and out of. A few years ago, Audi gave the R8 a attempt to move the car's needle toward the center of to-manic spectrum. We were not convinced.

The new one? Convincing. Engine and chassis: borrowed from the stellar Lamborghini Hurac?n, itself a solid contender in that supercar middle ground. Visual aggression: cranked up. Where the first R8 was insouciantly sleek, this one is square and stout. No longer beautiful, but undeniably purposeful. In Plus form, it's the most overtly sporting R8 yet, radiating aggression from every pore and backing the visuals with a drivetrain and chassis that can effortlessly cash every check written by the styling.

The McLaren 570S, on the other hand, represents precisely the opposite idea. The people in Woking started with the platform that underpins the 650S and its 675LT sibling, widely regarded as the purest-blooded supercars south of a million bucks. Then they made a series of profound and nontrivial changes to optimize this lower-priced Sports Series car for daily use.

Although the 570S retains the carbon-fiber structure of its more expensive stablemates, and its outrageous dihedral doors, the sills of those doors are cut lower for easier entry and exit. Every recent McLaren has a narrow center console, which allows the seats to be mounted closer together for a lower polar moment of inertia. The 570S replaces it with a control panel that cascades from the dash in a fashion that will be familiar to any owner of a European subcompact. The resulting extra space between the seats is given over to no fewer than three cup holders. This, in a two-seat car. You can't say McLaren doesn't have at least a mild grasp of what commuters want.

There are a few more concessions to everyday use. The active-aero system from the 650S, most notably the pop-up airbrake, is gone. Also gone: the deliberately offensive high-mounted dual exhaust of the Super Series cars, replaced by conventional exits under the rear bumper that won't deafen passengers or burn bystanders. What's left: 3189 as-tested pounds of supposedly sensible supercar from Woking, England, powered by a 562-hp, twin-turbo 3.8-liter V-8. In our testing, it obliterated the quarter-mile in 10.6 seconds with a trap speed of 133 mph. One gets the impression that McLaren's idea of "everyday usability" is something like Liberace's idea of "restrained and tasteful"; you can only understand it in the context of the firm's other products.

Even in Plus specification, which bumps the power from 540 to 610 hp, the Audi can't quite match the McLaren in a straight line, breaking the quarter-mile beam in 10.8 seconds at 129.5 mph. The undeniable traction advantage of Quattro is more than offset by a 495-pound weight penalty compared with the 570S, but on a less than perfectly prepared surface, the tables might turn. We're talking fractions of a second here.

As a supercar enthusiast since early childhood and a great fan of bench racing, your author could discuss the staggering numbers attached to these vehicles all day long. Did you know, for example, that you can get "stealth" exhaust finish on your 570S for the low, low price of $510? Or that the R8's V-10 doesn't reach its torque peak until a stratospheric 6500 rpm, just shy of the C7 Corvette Stingray's redline?

In the real world, however, there are only two numbers that matter. They are $192,450, the base price of the R8 V10 Plus, and $187,400, the base price of the 570S. The most expensive Audi and the least expensive McLaren sold on these shores. That makes them natural enemies, just like the Luftwaffe's FW 190A and the RAF's Spitfire Mk IX. We have a dogfight on our hands, which means there can be only one winner.

TO GIVE BOTH OF THESE VERY DIFFERENT super-cars a chance to properly display their talents, I convinced this magazine's former editor-in-chief, Larry Webster, to join me on a series of twisty roads across Maryland, Virginia, and West Virginia, followed by two short evenings at the Shenandoah road course. I expected that Webster and I would arrive at this comparison with sharply opposing preconceptions and loyalties. He's always adopted the pure racer's mind-set to high-performance cars, prizing low weight and chassis agility above all else, even when it comes to a daily driver. I'm from the other school of thought, with two Volkswagen Phaetons, an Audi S5, and a Lincoln Town Car in my recent ownership history. I thought the original R8 was flawless as an every-day supercar, power and lap time be damned. From the moment he arrived at our rendezvous point and unfolded himself from behind the McLaren's $5960 racing seats, Webster wasted no time confirming my suspicions.

"You can't get out of that thing without looking like an idiot," he noted, pointing at the 570S, "but otherwise I think it's perfect. What a brilliant combination of ride and precision. Feels like a landmark car to me." I think the McLaren is actually pretty easy to enter and exitóthe key is to make both of your feet the first thing to leave the car and the last thing back inóbut I wanted to take the R8's side for a moment.

"Well," I responded, "you can't deny that the Audi beats it in everyday use. The stereo, for one thingó"

"Stereo's fine in the McLaren," Webster interrupted.

"It most certainly is not," I replied, and I could feel a flush in my cheeks. "Not by my standards. The R8 provides a brilliant soundstage that wouldn't disgrace a set of Larsen 8s. The controls feel like they were machined individually from billets of polished stainless steel. Don't even get me started on the climate control. To adjust it on the 570S, you have to press the fan button, then muddle through a set of vague options that, I might add, all disappear through polarized sunglasses." Webster looked at me like I'd spent the last three minutes explaining my preference for a particular recipe of quiche. "Let's just get in the cars," he said.

I'd scouted a roller-coaster two-lane that rises and falls, hundreds of feet at a time, through the Green Ridge State Forest at the border of Maryland and West Virginia. I've driven this road in everything from an F-250 to a Corvette Z06, and where it really shines is in its long, steep uphill curves. Even a strong sports car can feel breathless trying to maintain, let alone increase speed in these conditions, but after an hour, it was plain that neither the R8 nor the 570S were bothered.

I'm partial to the Audi's progressive rush of power from about 4000 rpm all the way to redline. This is truly one of history's great sports-car engines, combining massive power with a seeming lack of rotational inertia. On public roads, it's just too much: too much power, too much wickedness in the way it whips the speedometer into the go-to-jail zone without so much as a hiccup.

But you can also grab the T-handled shifter, an unfortunately prosaic piece that isn't worthy of the R8's otherwise bespoke interior, toss it from "S" to "D," and let the car ease into commuter mode. That 91-decibel bellow at full throttle becomes a mild rumble. With a press of the Drive Select button on the steering wheel, you can choose Comfort and let this mid-engined supercar do its spot-on imitation of an A8 sedan. Then you can enjoy the Bang & Olufsen stereo, the outstanding visibility in all directions except those blocked by the large sail panels behind you, and the fuss-free manner in which the drivetrain mimics an electric motor.

It's relaxing, so much so that I failed to notice I was still doing outrageous speeds. I seemed to have left Webster behind. We met up at the next gas station and changed mounts quickly, not before exchanging a few sharp words about the Audi's seats. I think they're terrific, but he hates the lack of adjustment, pointing out that these cars are awfully expensive to not have some sort of power seatback tilt. He knew about a real demon of a road up in the mountains, so we headed that way.

I have had a fair amount of seat time in the 650S and 675LT, so this Sports Series McLaren was familiar territory. First impression: I really dig all the changes. The touchscreen and more logical control layout may not match the Audi for usability, and it's still too obviously an Android tablet with a unique font, but it's a real improvement over the flickery center stack in the 650S. The dashboard, made of three angled screens instead of the electromechanical setup in the more expensive models, is bright and legible.

Before I knew it, we passed a sign that says "High Incidence of Motorcycle Crashes Next 8 Miles." Without warning, Webster disappeared from view, following a banked curve around a massive rock, the Audi's V-10 roar echoing inside the McLaren's impressively quiet cabin. I gave chase.

In the short straights between turns, the 570S has the ability to claw the R8 back, maybe one car-length per five seconds. But under braking and in midcorner, the Audi seems to shed that weight differential, and on corner exit, it's murderous, sling- shotting out without a whisper of wheelspin. Meanwhile, I was fighting the McLaren's ECU. Instead of delivering power to the rear wheels and letting a brake-based traction system sort it out, the 570S waits until it thinks conditions are right before allowing the turbos to spool. This is good in the sense that it will no doubt prevent a lot of inadvertent throttle-on spins in the hands of inexperienced drivers, but it handed back all the advantage I'd gained in each straight.

At that kind of pace, individual seconds stretch into tangible objects, observed every which way by a mind furiously calculating closing speed and maximum corner velocity. We couldn't have been on that road for more than seven or eight minutes. Yet in that time, I found myself captivated by the McLaren, despite the indifferent stereo and generic interior. I believe the phrase for it is pur sang. Pureblood. Yes, it's the discount model. But in the space of moments, you can feel the direct kinship to its more expensive siblings, all the way up to the almighty P1. All the corners cut and all the costs reduced are merely peripheral, a $99 H&M suit worn by an Olympic decathlete. By the time I closed the gap on the R8, I was a true believer.

I thought that our little drive might have reconciled Webster to the Audi's merits; his sheer joy in flogging the thing was obvious in his take-no-prisoners approach to each corner entry. No such luck. When we came to a halt, he was caustic: "That is a luscious motor that makes exotic noises and big power without turbos. We should give it props for that alone. But the car feels devoid of emotion. Did the designers or builders have any passion in the thing?"

You can't argue against the Audi as a day-to-day proposition, in this company at least. It has the same fully realized feeling, and that same milled-steel solidity, as the A6 and A8 sedans with which it shares a showroom. "Inarguably the more livable car," Webster noted. "The dashboard is brilliant. I couldn't stop looking at it. And it's plenty quick. I just don't get worked up over it." I noticed, however, that like me, he gravitated to the Audi's clear engine cover during our talk. For a moment, we both just stood there and looked at the heart of the machine. The V-10. It's one of the finest engines I have ever experienced. And we may not see its like again. I wonder what the 570S would be like if you could replace the powerful but slightly anodyne twin- turbo V-8 with this strong, subtle, and exhilarating Audi-via-Lamborghini motor. I'm sure it would upset the weight balance. I'm not sure I'd care.

At Shenandoah that evening, the 570S was seven-tenths faster than the R8; looking at the data, that's almost entirely due to the power-to-weight advantage. But it's a bit scary. From the midcorner to the exit of Shenandoah's fourth-gear Big Bend, I struggled to get the power down without inducing life-changing oversteer. Maybe that's good. It's hard to value anything that comes without effort. You could be justifiably proud of getting the maximum out of it. It takes more than a checkbook to fully experience this automobile.

HAWKER HURRICANE. MESSERSCHMITT BF 109. Supermarine Spitfire. Focke-Wulf FW 190. Great Britain and Germany, locked in combat over the skies of London, the English Channel, Normandy, Berlin. Stunningly powerful and graceful machines pushed to the maximum, no quarter asked or given. How many generations of children have imagined diving out of the sun with cannon blazing, dispatching an opponent with a flawless split-S or chandelle, then waving ruefully as they parachute to the ground?

There is something both magical and visceral about those final piston-engined fighters. They became nearly perfect, and then in a flash, they were obsolete. Yet it is worth nothing that people still spend unjustifiable sums of money to restore and fly those warbirds, while the blunt-nosed jets that succeeded them stand abandoned and forlorn in aviation graveyards. Consider these two cars, the R8 V10 Plus and the McLaren 570S, as their spiritual and automotive successors, perhaps the last generation of completely piston-engined, gasoline-powered supercars.

We could easily make a case for the superiority of either vehicle, depending on driver skill, intended use, and how sensitive one is to things like interior quality or in-flight stability. As compromise supercars, bridging the wide gulf between everyday luxury cars and no-compromise track-day specials, both machines succeed admirably. The R8 really is fast; the 570S is truly livable.

The fact remains, however, that purchases of this nature are primarily, and justly, driven by emotion. Desire. This is where the Audi, extraordinary as it is, stumbles. At its heart, the R8 is a Hurac?n with all of that car's willful ridiculousnessófrom the flip-up start-button cover to the inexcusably massive and sunstroke-inducing windshieldósanded over. What's the point? Where's the fun, the passion, in that?

The 570S, on the other hand: It might be tamed for the street, but it has the bones, and the heart, of a proper racer. The doors are ridiculous. The interior is lamentable. Visibility isn't great. But you'd never stop wanting to drive it, never stop thinking about it, never stop smiling when you fall into the buckets at the end of a long day. It's the less reasonable of our pair, and that makes it the only reasonable winner. In this twilight of the traditional supercar, the McLaren truly shines.


MGCLS - LAX Car Service

Centre Of Attention In The Driving Seat Of An Aston Martin Rapide


Motor enthusiasts in the capital are in for a treat in the new year when Aston Martin, the British creator of the legendary luxury vehicle, opens its first full showroom in Abu Dhabi.

The firm yesterday announced that its "retail showcase" was up and running in Etihad Towers, as a prelude to the launch of a full-spectrum dealership in Abu Dhabi early in 2017.

It is currently under construction in the appropriately swanky AD location.

"Being in the capital is integral to our regional brand strategy," says Christopher Sheppard, CEO of Aston Martin Mena. The "showcase" will whet the appetite of any car enthusiast reluctant to make the journey to Dubai, where Aston has been a force in the luxury car business for some time.

A variety of Aston merchandise is available, the firm says. I can tell you that Aston T-shirts are one of Dubai’s most in-demand fashion items, and change hands on the "secondary market" at a premium.

"Owning as Aston Martin is a beautiful experience," Mr Sheppard adds.

I wouldn’t know about that, not having the spare Dh1 million that a top-of-the-range model can cost. But I can tell you that driving one is pretty darn good too.

I’m not sure whether it was as a taster for the AD showroom or as a present for my recent birthday, but the firm gave me the loan of a car for a weekend. Whichever, thank you Aston.

It was not my first time in the car that has been immortalised by James Bond, but I have to report it was the best.

I drove a Rapide S, which the company’s promotional literature describes immodestly as "the world’s most beautiful four-door sports car". I wouldn’t disagree with that.

I’m not by any means an expert on the technical side of cars, but even I know that 6 litres of V-12 engine is enormous. It can get you from standing to 100 kilometres per hour in 4.2 seconds and deliver a top speed of 327 kph.

The model I had was a pearly white colour, with sumptuous tan leather interior, and as many gadgets as anybody would ever want to tweak. Seat a bit too hot? Just turn on the seat cooler.

All the rest of the interior electronics were of the highest standard, proof I guess that Aston is benefiting from its partnership with Mercedes.

But by far the best thing about the car was … other people’s reaction to it. I valeted it at one five-star hotel in Dubai while I went inside for a cup of tea, and came out to find it surrounded by tourists with selfie-sticks.

The valet shooed them away while I tried to maintain the superior air of an everyday Aston driver.

At the Dubai International Financial Centre, the guys who run the underground car park leapt to their feet as I came down the ramp, and ushered me into prime parking space nearest the exit. The valet at Zuma left it standing right in full view of all the other motorists using the fashionable restaurant.

All this was testimony to the car’s good looks, but the most telling evidence came from an undoubted expert: Hazem Younis, assistant manager at the Aston service centre in Dubai where I (sadly) had to return the car.

In the line of his duties, he has driven every car in the Aston range, but he told me that the Rapide S was his personal favourite. "It has comfort but is still beautiful," he said. Again, I could not disagree.

LAX Car Service - MGCLS

Delta Air Lines Adds Seoul Flights Expands Korean Air Codeshare






Delta Air Lines passengers traveling from the East Coast of the United States to Asia will soon have another travel option as Delta Air Lines has announced expanded service between its headquarters and busiest hub in Atlanta and Seoul, South Korea.

Nasdaq reports that Delta Air Lines will launch the Seoul service on June 3, 2017, with a daily non-stop between Atlanta and Seoul’s Incheon International Airport, South Korea’s primary international airport.

“The carrier intends to strengthen its Asian presence through the introduction of these daily flights,” Nasdaq reported. “Delta will utilize a 291-seat, Boeing 777-200LR aircraft for operating the flights between the two cities.”

In addition to the new service between Atlanta and Seoul, The Dallas Morning News reported that Delta Air Lines and Korean Air, the busiest carrier in South Korea, will be expanding a codeshare agreement between the airlines.

According to the Morning News, the relationship between Delta Air Lines and Korean Air has not been the warmest in recent years, but the codeshare expansion and increased service from Delta’s Atlanta hub to Korean’s Seoul hub shows a thawing in the relationship.

“The two carriers were founding members of the SkyTeam alliance in 2000. But that relationship started to fray after Delta reportedly pushed for — and Korean rejected — a joint venture agreement across the Pacific Ocean,” the Morning News reported. “In such a deal, airlines share revenue and work together on pricing for a set of flights. (United Airlines has a joint venture with Japanese carrier All Nippon Airways, and American Airlines has such a partnership with Japan Airlines.)”

The change of heart for Delta Air Lines towards Korean Air is part of a change in strategy for Delta operations across the Asian continent, the Morning News suggests.

“Just last month, it eliminated several more routes to Tokyo’s Narita International Airport, a sign that it is starting to dismantle that hub.

“Delta still talks about its partnership with China Eastern, but a renewed agreement with Korean could provide its passengers with quicker access to secondary cities within Asia and let them avoid China’s notorious air traffic delays.”

While the Delta Air Lines partnership with Korean Air is expected to strengthen the airlines’ hubs in Atlanta and Seoul, Delta is also focused on growing business at its newest hub at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport in the Pacific Northwest. The hub has become a non-stop destination for many transpacific flights and it has also started to see far more domestic traffic.

As a result of the growing hub at Seattle, the Delta Air Lines is now locked in a battle with Alaska Air, the other airline with hub operations out of Seattle. The battle for marketshare in the region has become so intense that Dealta is partnering with local sports teams to offer bonus miles and other perks to customers, according to USA Today.

“During the 2016 football season, 12status members will be eligible for prizes and automatically receive one mile for each passing yard at Seahawks home games and 500 bonus miles for every 12,000 people who sign up for program. Each new SkyMiles member will also get 1,200 bonus miles.

“And, in a fun twist, when the Seahawks play the Los Angeles Rams on Dec. 15 in Seattle, 12status members will get 1,200 bonus miles if the roar of the crowd is loud enough to cause five false start penalties against the visiting team.”

Delta Air Lines has long been a partner of Alaska in terms of codeshares, though Alaska is not part of the SkyTeam alliance. If the companies continue to compete for marketshare, it begs the question of whether the Delta-Alaska partnership will grow cold in coming months and years.


MGCLS - LAX Car Service

After A Summer Of Deaths, Popular Halloween Rave Won't Be Held


For seven years, Hard’s Halloween-themed electronic dance music festival has been one of the more popular and anticipated raves in Southern California.

But organizers abruptly announced that the event would not occur this year. The move comes seven weeks after three young adults died after attending the Hard Summer music festival in San Bernardino County and growing scrutiny over the safety of such events.

A spokeswoman for Hard, which is owned by concert giant Live Nation, said they decided not to go forward with Hard Day of the Dead because of logistical issues. When asked whether the move was influenced by the three deaths, Alexandra Greenberg declined to comment.

But within the rave world, some observers said Hard could be having trouble finding a venue because three key facilities that used to host raves no longer do. The Los Angeles Sports Arena has been demolished, and the L.A. Memorial Coliseum and L.A. County fairgrounds have stopped booking the events following more overdose deaths.

There have been at least 25 confirmed drug-related deaths nationwide since 2006 among people who went to raves organized by Los Angeles-area companies. Twelve have died in Southern California — four in San Bernardino County and eight in L.A. County — and six in the Las Vegas area.

Two young women died of drug overdoses after they were transported from Hard’s summer event in 2015; another died in 2014. Coroner’s officials have not yet determined the cause of death of the three who died this summer.

Greg Wasik, editor of the website EDM Life, said the lack of big venues willing to host raves is causing problems for the industry in Southern California.

“Where else can you do it?” Wasik said. “It could be either [scheduling] conflicts or a hesitation on the people that control the venues to allow an event like that.”

Fans of electronic dance music mourned the news, which popped up on social media and blogs in recent days. A writer for the website Dancing Astronaut lamented Hard’s “nomadic situation” and “devastating obstacles.” The website Your EDM said fans of the rave would scramble to find alternative Halloween plans.

Greenberg said the firm decided earlier this year that it would be too difficult to have a summer rave at one new location — the Auto Club Speedway near Fontana — and find another venue for the Halloween event. Last year, both were at the Los Angeles County fairgrounds in Pomona.

LAX Car Service - MGCLS

Tuesday, September 20, 2016

2016 Ford Mustang GT Premium






The Ford Mustang received a major overhaul last year to mark its 50th anniversary, and the update included something for just about everyone. The 2016 model doesn't alter the formula dramatically, aside from the addition of the new Sync 3 infotainment system and several cosmetic tweaks. It's also available with some new options packages, including the California Special exterior treatment on the GT Premium trim we tested, which adds to its already eye-catching looks. For performance purists and weekend racers, the Mustang still features a venerable 5.0-liter V8 engine on the GT trim, which makes for a seat-pinning ride. And that makes it one of the best pony cars yet, as well as one of the most fun vehicles you can buy.

Pricing and Design
The 2016 Ford Mustang$41,375.00 at TrueCar is available as a Fastback coupe or a soft-top convertible and in five trim levels: V6, EcoBoost, EcoBoost Premium, GT, and GT Premium. There's also Shelby GT350 high-performance version.

The entry-level Mustang V6 starts at $24,145 and comes with a 300-horsepower, 3.7-liter V6 engine. Like all other trim levels, a 6-speed manual transmission modulates the power sent to the rear wheels. Other standard features include 17-inch aluminum wheels, automatic HID xenon headlights, LED taillights with sequential turn signals, body colored side mirrors, a capless fuel filler, keyless ignition and entry, cruise control, cloth front bucket seats, manual front seats with driver side height adjustment, and a tilt-and-telescoping leather-wrapped steering wheel. You also get an aluminum finish instrument cluster, an auto-dimming rearview mirror, a rearview camera, MyKey parental controls, Bluetooth for phone and audio, a 4.2-inch in-dash display, Ford Sync, and a six-speaker AM/FM/CD sound system with dual USB ports. The V6 Convertible starts at $29,645 and adds an Enhanced Security Package with an electronic locking center console, an electronic steering column lock, an active Anti-Theft System, and a wheel-locking kit.

The EcoBoost starts at $26,645 and comes with a 310-horsepower, 2.3-liter turbocharged EcoBoost engine. It also adds 18-inch aluminum wheels, a rear spoiler, LED foglights, a six-way power front seats, and active noise cancellation. The EcoBoost Premium starts at $29,645 and adds 20-inch wheels, heated exterior mirrors with Mustang logo puddle lights, a rear diffuser, ambient interior lighting, selectable drive modes, aluminum and chrome interior accents, dual-zone automatic climate control, heated and ventilated front seats, front seat leather upholstery, a nine-speaker audio system with satellite radio, and the Sync 3 system with an 8-inch touch screen and enhanced voice controls. The EcoBoost Premium Convertible starts at $35,415 and adds the Enhanced Security Package.

The Mustang GT trim starts at $32,395 and adds a 435-horsepower, 5.0-liter V8 engine. Standard features are equivalent to those on the regular EcoBoost trim, but add upgraded brakes, electronic line lock, and launch control.

The GT Premium we tested has a base price of $36,395 and comes with essentially the same standard features as the EcoBoost Premium. It also includes the $1,995 California Special option package that adds 19-inch black alloy wheels, a more prominent rear spoiler, and special exterior and interior trim details. The $1,795 Equipment Group 401A option package includes a 12-speaker Shaker Pro Audio System with HD Radio, blind spot detection, cross traffic alert, and driver memory functions. Our test car also came with a $795 SD card-based navigation option and a $395 Enhanced Security Package. With a $900 destination and delivery charge, the final sticker came to $41,375. And finally, the GT Premium Convertible starts at $41,895 and adds the Enhanced Security Package.

With the exception of standard secondary turn signals integrated into the hood vents on all GT models and an available black roof on the EcoBoost and GT coupes, the exterior of the 2016 Mustang hasn't changed much for the new model year. The design deftly balances nostalgia with a modernized look. Interior materials were upgraded on the 2015 model and include metallized dashboard toggle switches and aluminum dash inserts that add a sense rugged cool to the cabin.

Connectivity, Interface, and Technology
The biggest change for the 2016 Mustang is the addition of the Ford Sync 3 infotainment system. Like previous iterations of Sync, all connectivity is via a connected smartphone. This means there's no subscription necessary for cloud-connected features, although it can eat into your phone's data plan. The car can also connect to a remote Wi-Fi access point (like a public network), but only while sitting still. Whereas previous Sync systems were updated only via a USB drive, Sync 3 adds over-the-air updates when connected to Wi-Fi, which is convenient.

The Mustang's Sync 3 system isn't exactly brimming with options once you're connected. Currently there are only five apps for iOS devices and four for Android, which are largely the usual suspects, including Pandora, Spotify, iHeartRadio, Glympse, and MLB.com (for iOS). While Ford advertises Glympse as a Navigation & Travel app, it's really a location-sharing tool and doesn't have search capabilities like the Yelp or Google Local Search app available in other vehicles.

That said, Sync 3 remains one of the better OEM infotainment interfaces available. Its sharp graphics and large icons make on-screen information easy to discern at a glance and operate while driving. And its new capacitive touch screen is a lot more responsive than the resistive technology used with the previous MyFord Touch system. It also reacts quicker to input in general, and navigation maps refresh faster.

If you're not sold on Sync 3, however, it's worth mentioning that next year's Mustang will get Apple CarPlay and Android Auto capabilities that bring somewhat overlapping but more varied connectivity (as well as Sync Connect with embedded 4G LTE connectivity).

Given the car's relatively poor rear visibility, we really appreciated the car's blind spot warning system with rear cross traffic alert. The hill start assist also came in handy on grades, especially with the manual transmission. And for weekend racers, the Track Apps feature can capture and store info such as acceleration times and braking distance.

Performance and Conclusions
The 2016 Mustang GT Premium's 5.0-liter V8 engine is a pleasure, both in its visceral performance and the aural appeal of its growl. With 435 horsepower on tap under the hood, ample and awesome acceleration is always on tap, and flicking through the six speeds of the manual transmission is nearly effortless.

The Mustang is also surprisingly well-mannered for a muscle car, with a remarkably smooth ride and minimal tire and wind noise. And if you want to trade more performance for a less compliant ride, the GT Premium has four different drive modes—Normal, Sport, Track, and Rain/Snow—as well as three different steering settings.

With the addition of Ford Sync 3, the 2016 model is one of the best Mustangs yet. The prime competition is its long-term muscle car nemesis, the Chevrolet Camaro, which is all-new for 2016. The other major Detroit-based challenger, the Dodge Challenger, can't keep up with the Mustang or the Camaro on a twisty road, and it's not offered as a convertible (though it has a practical back seat and a large trunk). Neither vehicle can boast the long history and continuous production of the Mustang, or match its arguably iconic status. For the money, you won't find a rear-wheel vehicle that's more fun to drive than the 2016 Mustang.


MGCLS - LAX Car Service